
Putting LinkedIn spend in front of real buyers.
THE RESULTS
–31%
+46%
+38%
–24%
The challenge.
Plenty of leads, few good ones.
Cost per lead looked reasonable and forms kept coming in. But once leads reached sales, very few were worth pursuing.
The wrong people filled in forms.
Junior staff, students, consultants and people researching the topic, with no role in choosing software.
Budget spread too wide.
The best opportunities came from senior procurement and finance roles at larger companies. Much of the budget went to far broader audiences.
Paying for the wrong reach.
Ads were also reaching existing customers, competitors and companies that were never a realistic fit.
How we approached it.
Narrow the audience
Change the offer
Make the ads specific
What we focused on.
Matching landing pages
An ad about supplier management leads to a page about supplier management. Short pages, the product shown early, a demo easy to find.
Accepted by sales
We tracked which campaigns produced leads that sales accepted, rather than which ones simply produced forms.
Roles and company sizes
We checked which job titles and company sizes turned into real conversations and opportunities.
Budget follows quality
Ads with plenty of forms but no SQLs lost budget. The audiences that produced opportunities got more.
The outcome.
–31% per SQL
Not many more raw leads, but a much higher share that sales considered worth pursuing.
Smaller, but better
The company didn't need a bigger LinkedIn audience. It needed a better one.
Leads sales wants to call
Marketing and sales now work from the same numbers, and more leads turn into real conversations.
More use cases.
Different industries, same idea. The right marketing, not more marketing.

How one trade show became 19 qualified sales meetings

Cutting wasted LinkedIn spend and bringing in better security leads
Your company
Could yours be next?
Got a product that deserves more attention? Let’s write the next use case together.
Fewer wasted clicks. Better sales conversations.

